Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Thibault Square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Deadbeef 07:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1 Thibault Square[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had nominated this article for deletion via WP:PROD, but it was removed via the creator. Some of the sources supplied[1][2] look suspiciously like press releases, and the only other source with much content, from iol.co.za, doesn't seem enough to satisfy the general notability guideline. I couldn't find any other likely-looking sources online. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Second tallest building in one of Africa's major cities. Looks notable to me. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This building appears to be architecturally interesting, especially the "34-degree diagonal twist". However, the building has changed names a number of times so it is difficult to find articles on it. The link to the architectural firm is dead, which doesn't help. I can't find anything of significance. LaMona (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 09:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.