Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1950-51 MJHL season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merging is at editor's discretion and does not require an AfD. --PeaceNT (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Merged to MJHL Seasons. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1950-51 MJHL season[edit]

A1, looking at it, it seems as if it wont be expanded any further as 1951-52 MJHL season also falls for A1. S_RX 01:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. —Djsasso (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This season will be further expanded in the near future. Hockeyal (talk) 02:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)HockeyAl[reply]

I disagree !!! The MHJL has a rich hockey history. It's a "junior" league that at one point challenged for the Memorial Cup. Other sites would welcome this info. As for references many are listed, a lot of articles on here are hard to check. Hockeyal (talk) 02:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)HockeyAl[reply]

Delete or merge these articles into something on the MJHL. Article doesn't even define MJHL! JJL (talk) 02:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Junior leauges are normally not notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Junior leagues ARE generally notable, MINOR leagues are not. DMighton (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into one The league is notable and the seasons are semi-notable... but notable as a whole. This and the others should be merges into something like List of OHL seasons. DMighton (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per DMighton. I'd also like to correct a statement, which pertains to hockey terminology: minor professional leagues are notable, but "minor leagues" are also used to refer to sub-junior youth leagues, which are not notable. Ravenswing 17:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but I could see myself agreeing with merge. We have long stated that junior leagues seasons were notable when it came to the entire league, but were not notable for individual teams. I don't see why this league should be any different from any of the other junior leagues season pages. -Djsasso (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per DMighton. Junior leagues are very notable. Individual seasons, not quite as much. Placing them all into one article would help. Reso lute 22:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.