Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. no votes to delete, a decision on whether to keep or merge can be made at the talk page. TravellingCari 17:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

19-0: The Historic Championship Season of New England's Unbeatable Patriots[edit]

Unnotable book as it hasn't been released. ~~Possible hoax.~~ Tavix (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant coverage online, definitely not a hoax - see [1], article by the AP. 180 articles on google [2] for the book name in quotes -wiki. Meets WP:BK per criteria #1.Bsimmons666 (talk) 00:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is not a hoax. There are even screenshots of the book's cover on Google Search. This is simply an inevitable consequence of the long lead time on publishing, so in this case the publisher gambled (and lost) on a book that seemed reasonable at the time but sounds ridiculous in retrospect. *** Crotalus *** 00:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's a category for canceled books, and this is in it. Major publisher; major anticipated event. 00:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment I made a typo when I searched, that's why I wasn't getting anything. Sorry about the hoax comment. Tavix (talk) 00:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to an article on the Patriots, or that football season or Super Bowl. It is a fun trivia item but not important enough for its own article. Once you get to the punchline (the Pats lost and the book was cancelled) there is nothing more to say. Besides, more people will read it if merged with a major article. Redddogg (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the Patriots article and add third-party sources. It's an interesting bit of trivia that doesn't warrant its own article. sixtynine ^{• speak, I say •} 20:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — There's enough significant coverage of this never-released-because-someone-choked book in the Google search above. Remember, Reebok made two different "Perfectville (Pop. 1)" commercials to air right after Super Bowl XLII. MuZemike (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That should also be mentioned in the article on the game. It is not important enough for its own article, same as this. Redddogg (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 01:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.