Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18 Doughty Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, potential single purpose account(s) noted. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

18 Doughty Street[edit]

Article does not assert notability of subject. --SandyDancer 16:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 19:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 21:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep, this new TV station is groundbreaking in many ways: search the BBC and Guardian websites for supporting evidence.--Ordew 15:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason to delete this. This is a significant new TV channel, with some big name interviews. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.255.192.21 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Comment - the article doesn't assert notability, that is the test here. I must say I can't see that this venture is notable yet - may become so in future, or maybe it will fold very quickly. --SandyDancer 18:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep, This is a great example of a new phenomenon in "citizen" reporting and political debate in the UK. There are examples elsewhere but 18 Doughty St is a good example of this trend. The article may need updating but the fact stands that 18 Doughty St has been reported on in the US.Westerer 23:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep significant new quality TV station, and the first of its technological type in the UK.--Phillip Fung 23:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ezeu 19:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a new TV station with professional content. It's not a kid broadcasting a stream of junk from his bedroom. Also second Phillip Fungs comments.--jrleighton 13:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am sure that this will get picked up on by whoever concludes this debate, but I note three of the four "keep" votes so far come from users with little or no edit history... --SandyDancer 13:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only one of the keep votes seems to be as suggested by SandyDancer, not three.--jrleighton 01:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a few more references which makes this probably as viable as it will get. No opinion. Morwen - Talk 13:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As far as I know this is the first attempt at a serious internet-based news and comment TV station in the UK, which alone makes it notable in my view. Laurence Boyce 14:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.