Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/180 Degrees South: Conquerors of the Useless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP (nomination withdrawn). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

180 Degrees South: Conquerors of the Useless[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable documentary - no references provided to support notability other than an IMDB link. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep searchable under its shorter titles. Meets WP:NF. Has had both US domestic and Canadian and Japanese releases, and has received multiple reviews.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The article and the project will benefit from expansion and sourcing... but not by deletion becuase it needs to be done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:52, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Follow-up Always better to do it than just talk about it. The 26-word unsourced stub that was first nominated,[11] is now a nicely sourced 690 word start class,[12] and has been submitted for a DYK. Using more of the available sources, there is more that can be done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn, based on the references cited above and the improvements to the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.