Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15 Minutes Of Failure
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as nn-band. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
15 Minutes Of Failure[edit]
Completing listing started by Lacatosias. Very unfortunately named band fails WP:BAND. Daniel Case 13:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- i definately don't think this article should be deleted. i love 15 minutes of failure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alcatraz 99 (talk • contribs) .
- Comment Please note that Alcatraz_99 (talk · contribs · count), 203.213.30.4 (talk · contribs · count) and Swinger_95 (talk · contribs · count) would all appear to be the same person (see editing pattern of this AfD, for instance). ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 14:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- UPDATE: Alcatraz 99 also vandalized my user page. Not good. Seeing as this article may be a hoax, I am now upgrading my stance to speedy delete. Daniel Case 16:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very nn band or possible hoax; almost no relevant Google hits. Feezo (Talk) 15:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete short-lived, non-notable band. Gwernol 16:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
dont delete- you guys all have a serious control freak personality.next you'll all probably want to delete the beatles or rolling stones page.and to answer your question, swinger_95, and alcatraz99 are different people, i use a shared computer.but what i really don't understand is how this page is any different to daniel case's, no ones ever heard of him, and yet his page still lasts...and why would someone be so proud of deleting peoples pages, that certain person must be very self obsessed...besides, what difference does one extra page on wikipedia make anyhow. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.213.30.4 (talk • contribs) .
- Comment: Daniel Case's page is in the User: space, not the main article space, and therefore is permitted. If you'd like to talk about your band and want to contribute, create an account for yourself and put it on your user page. However, unfortunately your band is not notable enough to warrant its own article in the main encyclopedia. --Happynoodleboy 15:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- UPDATE: Now this anon user has vandalized my user page as well. Sockpuppeting (we are not fooled in the slightest regardless of what you say; your posting style as Alcatraz 99 and as the above anon are entirely too similar) and repeat vandalism, especially repeat vandalism using the sockpuppet in order to evade the warnings you've already gotten — this bad behavior just loses the argument regardless of the merits or lack thereof of the article.
- If you want to have a foggy chance of saving this article, Alcatraz 99, the burden is on you to include and provide evidence that not only did this band exist but that they have released the one major-label album or three notable indie-label albums that we require for articles about bands to be included. Daniel Case 13:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. --Happynoodleboy 12:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete , not notable. Anonymous anonymous 21:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.