Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/155142 Tenagra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of minor planets#Main index. as suggested by the nominator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

155142 Tenagra[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO; (re-)redirect to list ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 23:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 23:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri and MB: pinging contributors since last redirect. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 23:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable (or redirect to List of named minor planets: 150000–199999). Shaka, when the walls fell. Praemonitus (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sense in redirecting to a list which should probably be deleted as well. Fram (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Owen× ☎ 12:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to a list (either List of named minor planets: 150000-199999 or List of minor planets: 155001-156000#155101–155200) as is customary for minor planets which do not pass WP:NASTRO. 16:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think InterstellarGamer12321 meant List of minor planets: 155001–156000#142, per WP:NASTRO#Dealing with minor planets. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 18:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I meant, apologies for using the wrong anchor. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of minor planets: 155001–156000#142 per standard procedure. There's no good reason to change this. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.