Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1538 Detre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. To whatever the appropriate list article may be. Nobody here has mentioned it. Sandstein 08:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1538 Detre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Long-standing tradition to redirect these to the list page; recent discussions suggested not to do this with those numbered less than 2000, which would need a proper discussion as to their notability. Boleyn (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:NASTRO. No suitable references found. Praemonitus (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 03:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. This one has a bit of an unusual observational history: it was discovered in 1940, but then lost and not rediscovered until 1980 [1] [2]. That's all I found in the way of specific studies of this object, but it may be enough to save this article from being just a name and some orbital elements. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: per Praemonitus. That the thing was lost and subsequently rediscovered isn't "unusual" at all -- that happens sometimes in astronomy. It's certainly not any measure of notability. Nha Trang ^Allons! 16:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to moan Praemonitus & NukeThePukes but it would help if you state where you want it redirected, As someone who is clueless to all of this I have no idea where "the list page" is...... –Davey2010^Talk 01:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.