Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1512 Oulu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. As they say, size doesn't matter, at least not in terms of notability. Sandstein 15:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1512 Oulu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted and/or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak redirect per WP:DWMP. This object does receive some minor attention as a member of the Hilda family, but probably not enough for notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak redirect. I don't see the independent in-depth coverage of this body needed to satisfy WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is very well hung at 83km in diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.