Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1510 in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This should be a editing issue, not an AfD one. Black Kite (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1510 in India[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no scope for improvement and finding reference better to remove all articles in 1500 series and create a new one like 1500-1600 In India if necessary. Benedictdilton (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (state) @ 23:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as explained above sufficiently, If there's any field we are drastically incomplete, it's non-European history! DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to 1510s in India. There is not likely to be enough content for annual categories at such a remote period. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There are a dozen similar (yet unbundled) articles at AfD with varying consensus. Bundling was specifically requested at the 1521 AfD. (AfDs: 1500, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507, 1508, 1509, 1510, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1518, 1519, 1520, 1521, 1522, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526, 1526, 1527, 1528, ...) Not sure if an admin would be willing to combine the lot for the nom (or how that process would go) but no one has argued to consider these noms separately, nor to decide them separately. I recommend moving discussion to the first AfD (1500 in India) for the time being. czar · · 16:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.