Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1467 Mashona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1467 Mashona[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing worth merging, but possibly worth a redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 as is usual procedure if asteroid is found to be non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is research using this one as a particular example [1], studying it as one of a small group of asteroids [2], and considering close encounters between it and other asteroids [3]. I'm not sure whether they're enough in-depth coverage of this object to pass WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, per the usual procedure with asteroids. Neutrality^talk 18:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: A somewhat difficult call; it's on the edge in terms of Wikipedia notability, but I'll go with a redirect for now. Praemonitus (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.