Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1369 Coffee House (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1369 Coffee House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no major independent coverage, there's really nothing useful here. →ROUX ₪ 19:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - single source is the college newspaper, Google search turns up no coverage, company website has no links to news coverage of any kind. Seaphoto^Talk 19:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence for notability as per WP:CORP Catfish Jim & the soapdish 20:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete: Frankly, this could be easily speedied under G10 as an attack page. Even if you trim out the anti-Starbucks diatribes, the startlingly POV verbiage and other such nonsense, all we've got here is a local coffeehouse without any prominence or significance outside the borders of Cambridge, and not all that much within it. Fails WP:CORP and the GNG by leaps and bounds. Sole contribution of a SPA who put this together in 20 minutes a few weeks ago and hasn't been seen since. Ravenswing 15:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Though a coffeehouse staffed by wastrels sounds like my kind of place, this is fairly obviously promotional and has no encyclopedic significance outside of its community and customer base. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, is it about time to call it per WP:SNOW? Sadads (talk) 01:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.