Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12th Cork Scout Troop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
12th Cork Scout Troop[edit]
- 12th Cork Scout Troop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a page about a scout troop, and doesn't make any assertion of notability. Unless there is a specific reason why this particular troop is notable, it should be deleted. Slashme (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Individual scout troops are inherently non-notable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yes generally scout troops are not notable. I disagree with the term "inherently non-notable" because that may imply that scout troops could never be notable--which is not true becuase, well, the Madison Scouts for example--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nearly all scout troops are inherently non-notable, and this one is no exception. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This troop is certainly not notable, being neither very old, very large or well known for other reasons, and there is nothing to merge anywhere else. I have done some wikification, but it can never be notable. It should be transwikied to Scoutwiki. --Bduke (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.