Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11s up (solitaire)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

11s up (solitaire)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

11s up (solitaire) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The game is non-notable and unsourced. It is not listed in major sources like Parlett (1979) or Morehead and Mott-Smith (2001) or the more recent Parodi (2004) and Arnold (2011). Bermicourt (talk) 10:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.