Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1150 K Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1150 K Street[edit]

1150 K Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apartment building that does not meet WP:GNG, lacks coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:GEOFEAT.Onel5969 TT me 17:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I could find no "significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." so it does not meet WP:NBUILDING criteria for buildings. Searching Newspapers.com for 1150 K Street found nothing. GBooks returns a couple of trivial hits, one for a work of fiction, the other for a lobbying organization. My guess is that this article was added because the building was listed in the List of tallest buildings in Washington, D.C.. However, the citation supporting the height of this building is not a WP:RS source. Just because there is a website that states that the building is of a certain height that make it one of two buildings that are the 17th tallest in the city does not confer notability. Other buildings listed in List of tallest buildings in Washington, D.C. should probably be reviewed for notability. The Watergate Hotel, this ain't. Cxbrx (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.