Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1000 – Oru Note Paranja Katha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1000 – Oru Note Paranja Katha[edit]

1000 – Oru Note Paranja Katha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any sources in English and Malayalam about this film other than what is in the article. There is only one review (Times of India) and one music review (Mathrubhumi). Two reviews are needed. Created by a blocked (paid) user. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep effectively it has two reliable sources reviews as the music soundtrack is part of the film, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Changed to weak keep as the music review is not a review, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Per Atlantic306's rationale. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment @Atlantic306: @Donaldd23: After viewing the Malayalam article in Mathrubhumi, it is not a music review of the film. It is simply a preview of the film's plot and the cast and crew of the film. Also in the article, the content before the first picture and second picture in the article is the same. TamilMirchi (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 23:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.