Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Swiss Stored Data
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
100% Swiss Stored Data[edit]
- 100% Swiss Stored Data (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable term or brand. Could possibly be morphed into an article about Swiss data storage, which is a concept covered by RS: [1], [2], [3] Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 00:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I was actually about to tag this one earlier, but had to leave the house. Non-notable label that has yet to catch on. It might at some point, but that is yet to be seen. If anything for a merge I'd recommend a overall data privacy page, not one restricted just to the Swiss. Caffeyw (talk) 06:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete According to the article, this label only has 1 user and is not notable. 2q2q (talk) 23:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it could be merged into an article on the promoting company, but Pattle AG itself does not even seem notable. W Nowicki (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—Not enough coverage. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.