Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Love (2012 film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
100% Love (2012 film)[edit]
- 100% Love (2012 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable according to Wikipedia:Notability (films)
- The film is not historically notable
- The film has not received any major award
Solomon7968 (talk) 07:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I had to dig, but I found some reviews and articles about the film. It's light, but just enough to pass notability guidelines for films. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am sure that you got reviews for the 2011 Telegu film of the same name. Can you provide citations of the reviews to clarify? Solomon7968 (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The TOI and Indian Express articles mention director Ravi Kinagi and star Jeet, so they're the right film. The India Glitz and One India articles are for a different film. So maybe more references are needed. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep It is a mainstream Bengali feature film, starring major actors/actresses, and made significant business. Easily meets WP:GNG. For comparison, it is equivalent to a Hollywood movie from a major studio, and making significant business. Of course the article will gain with more references. Use this customized search for Indian English Newspaper search. --Dwaipayan (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - Very notable film with notable music as well. It was heavily overshadowed by the Telugu film of the same name, but the Telugu industry is also bigger.Pectoretalk 18:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.