Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1/0 (web comic) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Close Wasn't aware of the turnaround. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1/0 (web comic)[edit]
- 1/0 (web comic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renominating since last AFD closed as no consensus. As I pointed out in the last AFD, the Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards do not convey notability per WP:WEB (see r Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Online (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures, Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(web)/Archive_08#Web_Cartoonist.27s_Choice_award and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lackadaisy_(3rd_nomination)), and without it, the comic meets absolutely no other criterion of WP:WEB. Most keep !votes in the last AFD were merely WP:ITSNOTABLE and WP:ILIKEIT, with no real policy-based discussion either way. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why are you renominating within hours of the closing of the prior AfD? CycloneGU (talk) 18:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural close. The previous AFD was initially closed delete at 14:39, 26 April 2011. Closing admin Sandstein was asked at his talk to re-evaluate his determination of consensus and reversed the close to no consensus at 00:42, 28 April 2011. This AFD was opened at 12:16, 28 April 2011, less than 12 hours after the amended closing of the previous AFD. If there is a claim that something was improper about the previous AFD's closure or its subsequent alteration, that's what deletion review is for, not an instantaneous AFD relist. Serpent's Choice (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.