Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1. Allgemeine Verunsicherung
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per consensus. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1. Allgemeine Verunsicherung[edit]
- 1. Allgemeine Verunsicherung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable uncharted album, completely unsourced Rapido (talk) 23:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Quantumobserver (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This is utter rubbish. There are links to other sources of information to support the article. It charted in Austria so this is a charted album. --Cexycy (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I concur... what do you mean unsourced? Look at the page history and the sources were there long before your AfD. AfD's are for non-notable or poorly-sourced. This article could use some independent reviews, but that should encourage improvement by the community, not an AfD. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the general precedent on Wikipedia is that if a band is notable, their full-length commercially-released albums get articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.