Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-800-Therapist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1-800-Therapist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no independent and reliable sources that indicate that this company is notable. Note that the only apparent reliable source is http://ireport.cnn.com, but CNN clearly states that they do not vet ireport. I am One of Many (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject is considered notable through multiple sources including CrunchBase, PRNewswire, and PRWeb. Abomination13 (talk) 20:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC) -- sockpuppet --I am One of Many (talk) 02:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Please note that Abomination13 is now blocked as a possible sock puppet. —rybec 03:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Sources with more than incidental coverage all appear to be spam/PR and do not meet the threshold of reliable sources. As noted above the CNN article cited in the refs is actually CNN iReport - essentially self-published, not RS, and a regurgitation of the same PR used in the other cites. Note, An article with this title was previously deleted, but I am unable to find the link. Dialectric (talk) 11:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Exactly per Dialectric, any source with a substantial coverage of subject is a PR release. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 23:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and others. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.