Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-dom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 12:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-dom[edit]

There is already an entry on Wiktionary for -dom. CSD A5 appears to be applicable; however Mikkalai is in disagreement with my interpretation. So I will bring to AfD. James084 21:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSD-A5 is thoroughly inapplicable. Did you read it at all? A test question for James084: which wikipedia procedure is mentioned in A5? mikka (t) 22:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

del. No potential beyond dicdef IMO. mikka (t) 22:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 20:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing beyond a Wiktionary entry, if that.--Adam ^(talk) 20:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this were to be deleted, then are the other suffixes to be deleted as well? --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 20:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete dicdef, and yeah... I would apply this logic to all prefixes and suffixes.--Isotope23 21:05, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.