Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(It's Not War) Just the End of Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(It's Not War) Just the End of Love[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable single. Recommend deleting or redirecting back to album article Postcards from a Young Man per WP:NSONGS. The song hasn't charted, primarily because it hasn't even been released yet. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. SnottyWong ^confabulate 17:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. If it had placed on a country's national chart, that would be different. As for now, it hasn't done that, so, delete.--Caravan train (talk) 18:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Having not yet been released commercially it's hardly likely to have charted yet, but being the new single by Manic Street Preachers, one of the biggest bands in the UK, it's already getting heavy airplay on BBC Radio 1 and there's already enough coverage out there, e.g. BBC Wales Music review, This Is Fake DIY review, NME, and when it does get released, the chances of it not charting are rather slim.--Michig (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- is released next week and is a notable single. --92.4.41.220 (talk) 10:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Postcards from a Young Man. Even if it does chart, that's not a guarantee that a standalone article is justified. -- Whpq (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Whether or not it is going to chart is WP:CRYSTAL. SnottyWong ^confess 17:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not it will receive sufficient coverage is not, however. I really don't see how deleting it now is going to help the encyclopedia.--Michig (talk) 19:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sourcing looks good, charting is virtually certain, and it would be silly to have an article for every MSP single except for this one anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew L. --FormerIP (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.