Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/‡biblios.net (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ‑Scottywong| comment _ 22:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
‡biblios.net[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- ‡biblios.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable online database. Appears to be dormant. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:17, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. However lackluster the article may be, the content is there. Appears to be very notable and useful to people. LogicalCreator (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per the sources presented in the first AfD. SL93 (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Sources added to the article:
- Oder, Norman (January 27, 2009). "As ‡biblios.net Emerges, a New Opportunity for Catalogers (and Competition with OCLC)?". Library Journal. Retrieved April 13, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher= - J. Hane, Paula (February 2, 2009). "Open Solutions for Libraries Gain Momentum". Information Today. Retrieved April 13, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help)
- —Northamerica1000(talk) 05:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oder, Norman (January 27, 2009). "As ‡biblios.net Emerges, a New Opportunity for Catalogers (and Competition with OCLC)?". Library Journal. Retrieved April 13, 2012.
- Keep – Per the sources I presented above; the topic passes WP:GNG. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.