Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Проблема Бэкона

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Проблема Бэкона[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay/Original research Jac16888 ^Talk 12:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - On article's talk page, user who authored the article claims the article's content is a self-evident truth, that does not require sources. Definitely original research. 13:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Delete This is the English wikipedia - no cyrillic please. Warden (talk) 13:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not sure "The Problem of [Francis] Bacon" would pass muster as an encyclopedia topic if it was rendered in English, which this isn't. Let's call it a content fork and move along. Russian Wikipedia is that way. -------> Carrite (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - A10 - as per WP:PNT#Проблема Бэкона, this subject is already covered at Baconian method. Singularity42 (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per Singularity42. And as a comment re Warden's statement: new articles in a language other than English are not subject to automati deletion just because they're not in English. WP:PNT will have a look at them and prod them if no translation has been begun within two weeks. That's the common procedure for such pages. De728631 (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not-English with this being the English WP afterall. Think we need a "sticky" not-english PROD like {{BLP-PROD}}. Mtking (talk) 01:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Couldn't there be a speedy transwiki to the other language wikipedia, with subsequent deletion here? That way, the correct language can vet the article, while we don't have to process the thing at all. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The article has already been deleted thrice on the Russian Wikipedia. I don't think they will appreciate it if we make them have to do this a fourth time. --Lambiam 10:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as essay/OR (on the basis of Google Translate). -- 202.124.74.52 (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per 202; essay/OR in any language. --Lambiam 10:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Простота и актуальность идей данной статьи, понятных всем думающим читателям без привлечения иных источников, придаёт им качества самоочевидных истин, не требующих авторитетных подтверждений. Поэтому данная статья соответствует правилу Википедии, не требующей подтверждения информации, содержащейся в самом предмете статьи, которую любой может проверить.

Правила удаления спорных и ложных текстов неприменимы к очевидно истинным, редактирование которых следует ограничить соучастием авторов. Предлагаемое усовершенствование правил Википедии послужит торжеству Истин, которые спасут мир. Mark (talk) 12:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google translation of above:

Simplicity and relevance of the ideas in this article, understandable to all readers thinking without the involvement of other sources, gives them a quality of self-evident truths requiring no authoritative confirmation. The article therefore corresponds to the rule of Wikipedia that does not require confirmation of the information contained in the subject article, which anyone can verify. Rules for removal of controversial texts and false are not applicable to the obvious truth that editing should be restricted to the complicity of the authors. The proposed improvement of the rules of Wikipedia will the triumph of truth that will save the world.

I don't think I need to point out the obvious problem with the statement. Singularity42 (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Delete JDDJS (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essay in Russian. Hekerui (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.