Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Бобок

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Бобок[edit]

I doubt the veracity of this article. There is no district in Chicago referred to in Cyrillic characters, and the lack of sources/references only further leads to the prospect of WP:NFT Flewis^(talk) 09:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An un notable district.--SkyWalker (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A google search reveals nothing to authenticate this claim. Kieranmrhunt (talk) 12:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could not find sources to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Someone was Bo-bored one day. Montrose Avenue is far west near the O'Hare Airport, Division Street is in the east, and I don't know where Ashborn Street would be. Reminds me of The Blues Brothers, where they listed their address as "1060 West Addison Street", and all the Nazis ran out to Wrigley Field. Mandsford (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as hoax. The district has Division Street as its northern border and Montrose as its southern border, but Montrose is actually 4 miles north of Division. Also, there is no Ashborn street in Chicago. Also, Cyrillic characters are not used to provide the English names of neighborhoods in the United States. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G3. Assuming that the author meant north when he wrote south and south when he wrote north, and meant Ashland rather than "Ashborn", I must live in this "district" … but, wait, I don't. Deor (talk) 23:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.