Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ștefan Bănică Sr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. All of the commenters other than the nominator voted keep, thanks to forces found by Biruitorul. (non-admin closure) Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ștefan Bănică Sr.[edit]

Ștefan Bănică Sr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR 4meter4 (talk) 03:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep — one of the greatest Romanian actors of the 1960s-‘80s. Plenty of reliable sources, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Bizarre nomination, WP:BEFORE was clearly skipped, should be withdrawn forthwith. — Biruitorul Talk 18:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please WP:Assume Good Faith. I did do a search in ProQuest and my university library and nothing came up. I also searched in google books. I don’t speak Romanian and these sources didn’t pop up. Clearly you have a different skill set at researching in Romanian, which is great.4meter4 (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep — I added in the past couple of days more info and references that should clearly establish the notability of this well-known actor. Clearly, the article could be further expanded, but I hope those additions should be enough to avoid deletion. Turgidson (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep — As noted above, clearly notable.Anonimu (talk) 11:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.