Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Širom (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The debate was relisted three times and there is still no clear consensus among the contributors. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Širom (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not asserted, PROD removed by author without notification. Laber□^T 11:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 01:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 01:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all better, newly founded with nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 02:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At the moment I only found [1] and [2]. From what I see, doesn't seem like it will pass WP:GNG --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notified WikiProject Slovenia --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; the first reference cited in the article ([3]) and both references found by Lemongirl942 all constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources (radio station, journal and newspaper with national reputation, respectively). — Yerpo ^Eh? 11:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show notability. And currently provided sources are not enough, either. `Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, what would constitute enough in-depth coverage in your opinion? There is in-depth coverage by a national radio station (Val 202, part of Radiotelevizija Slovenija), plus short, but targeted articles by "one the most influential political magazines in the country" (Mladina) and by the national daily broadsheet newspaper (Delo). By what criteria is this insufficient? — Yerpo ^Eh? 13:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - "short, targeted articles", in my humble opinion, are slightly better than tangential mentions. In lieu of in-depth coverage, if there were quite a few of those, say 7 or 8, that would suffice. But as I said, my searches turned up nothing, and the existing sources don't meet the burden of WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Inclined to agree with Yerpo. The cited references are not trivial in nature, and so the subject appears to just pass WP:MUSIC criterion 1. Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.