Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ōnaka Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as any Japanese users are welcome to find and add any sources (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 01:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ōnaka Station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Way too short, and not noteworthy. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - An article being short is not a proper rationale for deletion. Rail stations are considered notable and this is a station serving the largest city (Gujō) I've ever seen anyone consider for deletion. Such a station serving a similarly populated city in the UK like Beeston railway station would never be considered for deletion. Is this systemic bias? --Oakshade (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. What Oakshade said. Also, a station which opened in 1933 will have plenty of sources discussing it, albeit in Japanese. Mackensen (talk) 12:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above. Established consensus is that railway stations are notable enough to sustain stand alone articles. Mjroots (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.