Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Özcan Özdemir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 11:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Özcan Özdemir[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a more or less orphaned article about a very minor person in the Turkish (and maybe international) film industry. It is referenced to nothing but IMDB where his acting credits are all for for bit parts like "Truck driver (uncredited)" and most recently "Soldier (uncredited)". This is no good when it comes to establishing notability. IMDB also gives him three credits as a lighting technician, which is also no good. There is nothing to suggest that he has won awards or who written the book when it comes to lighting films.

There is no corresponding article in Turkish Wikipedia. The author seems to be interested in only this one person and shares a name with him, albeit spelled very slightly differently. This raises suspicion of autobiography and vanity.

Key points: Not notable and not verifiable due to no RS references. DanielRigal (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing for an imaginably better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 20:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.