Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çağıl Uyar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Çağıl Uyar[edit]

Çağıl Uyar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod, fails WP:NHOCKEY Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Another in a very long string of articles about NN Turkish hockey players, and at least we've put to rest the inane notion that they possibly satisfy any element of NHOCKEY, which they do not. No evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 14:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Nothing notable about this player, and definitely does not meet NHOCKEY.18abruce (talk) 14:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This player fails all of the criteria needed for an article to exist about them. Deadman137 (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.