Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ádám Hamar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ádám Hamar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically meets WP:NFOOTBALL with only 17 mins of football 7 years ago. A Hungarian search brings us a third tier football match report in a local paper, another brief match report and a transfer report. There is strong consensus that players that only pass NFOOTBALL by a few minutes need to meet WP:GNG. He has been playing in the lower tiers for the overwhelming majority of his career and is unlikely to ever play at professional level again. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL (with one or two appearances, or only a handful of minutes) is not enough when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to meeting the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.