Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'s-Hertogenbosch Avenue 2 railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

's-Hertogenbosch Avenue 2 railway station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub failing WP:CRYSTAL. —fetch ·comms 22:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't even know when it will be completed; definently fails WP:CRYSTAL. Derild 49 21 ☼ 23:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Little information is known at present about the new station" just about says it all here. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, no sources, not even a known completion date. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable. WP:CRYSTAL applies. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.