Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"maury deutsch"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Withdrawn your prayers have been answered. Kotepho 23:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"maury deutsch"[edit]

First of all, the article's title would need a change. Putting that aside, the subject of the article is, as far as I can see, quite non-notable on its own. Sarg 12:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With the added links, and more soon to come, it is clear the Mr. Deutsch is a notable individual, deserving of a place on Wikipedia.

How does one go about changing the title? And what would you reccomend?

Try 'googleing'... Music Compasition and "maury deutsch", he has got hundreds of articles about him.

Keep Definetly notable. This person is a doctor who's even written books on dance band arranging. The article itself does need cleaned up to wikipedia standards and for that I tagged it wikify. OSU80 15:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Rewrite. No sales rank on any of his books, but since I'm seeing publication dates of forty years ago and they're all out of print, little wonder. RGTraynor 16:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I just cleaned it up, wikified it, and rewrote it (somewhat). Doesn't look suspicious now. — Wackymacs 17:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, the article is much better now, so I'll have to change the vote to a keep. I see the title has also been changed to a proper one! Could someone now remind an old wikipedian how to withdraw a nomination from here? ;) Sarg 21:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I find striking through the nomination, adding a line to the end of the discussion calling for a speedy keep and early close, "as nomination is withdrawn and all votes are to keep", and offering a prayer fora ttention to the Powers That Be via the edit summary is usually effective

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.