Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"bigger than Jesus" controversy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 15:33, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"bigger than Jesus" controversy[edit]

It's already at The Beatles. This might be large enough to become an article of its own, but i'm unsure there. No Vote on the article itself, on the content, Expand if Kept, Merge if Deleted, although the latter is moot since it's already merged retroactively into The Beatles. Karmafist 22:29, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into The Beatles or John Lennon Niz 22:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Beatles article has more information than this as it happens so this is surplus to requirements. Capitalistroadster 00:46, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Capitalistroadster. - Dalbury (talk) 02:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per above, however this was a major controversy in the 1960s, so it might be worth an article if it didn't duplicate information alresdy in place. 23skidoo 03:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Beatles if there is no need for merge. Xoloz 04:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no redirect -- very, very unlikely search string. Jkelly 05:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it's already covered elsewhere. I agree that this is an unlikely search string. Jacqui ^★ 01:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't merit its own article. *drew 02:30, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.