Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"No for Compulsory Military Service" Movement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 00:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"No for Compulsory Military Service" Movement[edit]
- "No for Compulsory Military Service" Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined A7 nominee. Fails WP:GNG. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Any organization which exists strictly on Facebook (which is what the article itself claims) cannot, by definition, be notable. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:41, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability neither established nor evident, Facebook group. WWGB (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Epic failure of WP:N. I think we could probably WP:SNOW this one. Pmedema (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - An article about the creator might fly, an article about this Facebook group does not. Carrite (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.