Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Canon"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Canon"[edit]
- "Canon" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. No evidence of coverage in independent reliable sources to satisfy notability. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. This is a future movie which has not even started filming yet. As such, it normally would not have an article yet. And even after it starts filming, there would still need to be reliable sources to justify having an article while it is filming. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. Keb25 (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. Checked site, movie is not yet in production. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sounds like an interesting plot, but as others have said, WP:NFF applies. BTW, homosexuality is a life, not a lifestyle. ;) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 00:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.