Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/!mindparade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

!mindparade[edit]

!mindparade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable sources in the article, and I am not seeing any in Google News or the first few pages of Google Search either. John Vandenberg (chat) 08:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 16:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 16:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Doesn't come close to WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO: one self released album, and no major coverage. Even if the one local source cited is correct in that the band has "a bright future", they haven't arrived yet. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:BAND. I see one piece of local coverage and nothing else that meets WP:RS. --Kinu t/c 17:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.