Wikipedia:Annual Reviews/Approved

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  1. Keilana (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I write extensively in biology and medicine and would love to have access - my university does not give me access to about half of the Biology/Life sciences reviews which unfortunately includes the ones I'd like to use. Keilana (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Keilana: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Everymorning (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I often edit medical articles and have been for a year or two, esp. in fields of public health, so I would really like to have access to all the Annual Reviews journal (especially Annual Review of Public Health, but others too). Everymorning (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Everymorning: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. WhatamIdoing (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) In 2014, I was in the top 50 editors for total number of edits to medicine-related articles, and I don't have access to this journal any other way. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @WhatamIdoing: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hzh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit on a wide variety of topics, but of my close to 40k edits, only around 2,500 edits are science related, and I like to see that number increased because I believe I can contribute more to many pages that need improving. Having access to the Annual Reviews series will help as I no longer have access to many academic journals, including the Annual Reviews journals. I specialise in biochemistry, molecular biology, structural biology and biophysics. Hzh (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hzh: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Queeste (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I write in the Dutch Wikipedia since 2009 and I'm interested in the psychology-reviews. --Queeste (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Queeste: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Espresso Addict (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been an editor on en-wiki for 9 years, with ~27k manual edits, ~225 article creations & ~90 DYKs. I edit in various biological and medical areas, but am frequently hampered by my lack of access to medical/science journals. Review journals would be especially useful to comply with the referencing standards for medical articles. Espresso Addict (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Espresso Addict: Approved Expect an emails shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Meloe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My area of interest is biology and ecology. I´m interested in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics and Annual Review of Entomology, which are main sources for my topics, but others would come handy, too.--Meloe (talk) 08:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Meloe: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. kdammers (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing Wik en, se, es, and de for almost ten years. One of my areas of interest is osteohistology, along with other archaeological topics that relate to taphonomy, and biology. Kdammers (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kdammers: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Themidget17 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm a little shy of the 500 edits requirement, in spite of having registered for an account over a year ago. However, I contribute the most to medical articles, and this type of access would be very useful. Themidget17 (talk) 04:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Themidget17: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Thanks for setting up access to Annual Reviews. I'll see what the scope of this subset of the journals is--I expect it will be useful for editing articles on common diseases, for sure, and perhaps for editing articles on human genetics and maybe even psychology. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (Watch my talk, How I edit) 01:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @WeijiBaikeBianji: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Dcirovic (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Thanks for setting up access to Annual Reviews. I have been involved with several Wikipedia projects since 2010. My contributions are primarily concerned with chemistry and biology. Having access to some of these journals (i.e.: Annual Review of Biochemistry, Annual Review of Biophysics, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) would make me more productive. --Dcirovic (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dcirovic: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AFlorence (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) --Florence (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @AFlorence: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. A.M.Z.A (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) A.M.Z.A Talk 11:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi AMZA, it doesn't look like you've done much medical editing - can you explain why you need this resource? Nikkimaria (talk) 14:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: Hi, I am in these fields (medicine and biology) i have expertise. And I can help improve these articles.Thanks.A.M.Z.A Talk 15:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. SlimVirgin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been working on some medical articles recently, and would appreciate access to medical sources. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @SlimVirgin: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]