Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 2

< September 1	September 3 >

September 2

Template:Geology2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geology2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Meets Reasons for deletion number 10: redundant template because it largely duplicates {{Geology}}. Of the two, the footer template is more appropriate per WP:NAVBOX because the subjects are not tightly related. RockMagnetist(talk) 23:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Navigation is far more useful, at the foot, after the article has been read, than at the top, before reading. We need to standardise on footer navigation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 07:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Oceania table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Content merged to main article; history preserved at 2009 flu pandemic in Oceania table. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Oceania table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw ^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alakzi (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete No need to have a template that is only transcluded once. I don't even see where there was enough edits in the page history where forking to avoid edit conflicts should even have been a concern. Per Frietjes, deleter should be wary of attribution per WP:RUD.—Bagumba (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Europe table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Content merged to main article; history preserved at 2009 flu pandemic in Europe table. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Europe table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw ^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And there is precedent to keep it too, see the elements infoboxes (eg. Template:Infobox hydrogen). Christian75 (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merely waving at an example doesn't justify why WP:OTHERSTUFF should apply in this case.—Bagumba (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand your point. The person says there is "plenty of precedent", and I gave an example where TfD didnt vote that way - and its all elements which have its own template. Christian75 (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Montanabw Christian75 (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That argument has been rebutted twice.—Bagumba (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alakzi (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete No need to have a template that is only transcluded once. Per Frietjes, deleter should be wary of attribution per WP:RUD.—Bagumba (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Africa table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Content merged to main article; history preserved at 2009 flu pandemic in Africa table. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 flu pandemic in Africa table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on it's one respective article; should be substituted and deleted.Curb Chain (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's a template transcluded as a table, keeping the references on the template. It's unusual, but it makes sense in the context it is used; I don't see a policy against its inclusion, it's not being used as a navbox. Montanabw ^(talk) 05:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for this (Template:Kurds infobox, Template:Infobox Kosovo War). Wikipedia:Templates: "Templates are pages that are embedded (transcluded) into other pages to allow for the repetition of information". WP:TMP: "The Template namespace on Wikipedia is used to store templates, which contain Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages, usually via transclusion.Curb Chain (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at the time this was created, data was changing rapidly, and the table was separated to reduce edit conflicts, and improve article and table editability -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete after substitution. and possibly, move to articlespace and/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alakzi (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete No need to have a template that is only transcluded once. I don't even see where there was enough edits in the page history where forking to avoid edit conflicts should even have been a concern. Per Frietjes, deleter should be wary of attribution per WP:RUD.—Bagumba (talk) 07:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AS Monaco Basket depth chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Content merged to main article; history preserved at AS Monaco Basket depth chart. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AS Monaco Basket depth chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only transcluded by one page, AS Monaco Basket. Recommend to substitute and delete.—Bagumba (talk) 02:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge/delete as suggested. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AS Monaco Basket roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'subst and delete. Content merged to main article; history preserved at AS Monaco Basket roster. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AS Monaco Basket roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only transcluded by one page, AS Monaco Basket. Recommend to substitute and delete. —Bagumba (talk) 02:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge/delete as suggested. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.