Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own

Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

28 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


Repeated creation of vandalism-only articles involving the name "Tikeem Cumberbatch". There was at least one "Tikeem Cumberbatch" account blocked yesterday (April 17, 2016). Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Both accounts blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 19:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK quacking into a megaphone with their name and edits. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

29 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


All three accounts vandalized WP:Aiv within the same time frame and were created one after the other got blocked. I would like a checkuser check to be done so the IP address can be blocked and to make sure that all of the sleeper accounts are covered. CLCStudent (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • A range block is not feasible. No tagging per WP:DENY. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Username is a quack, making same scatological edits as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Added 2nd user, crated same page as first user listed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Accounts blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


03 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Created page Tikeem, rather obvious quacking. If possible, check for sleepers? RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Sleeper check probably unnecessary and unhelpful. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious duck from username. Must be that time of day again. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I've added 3 other rather obvious socks as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more with the same scatological fetish in the username. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

09 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

self-explanatory, alas. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


09 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

created Oh oh ohhhhhh tikeem is the best, plus the usual indicia. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

09 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

All posted content about feces in a close time range. Please block their IP address. CLCStudent (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This has to be the weirdest CU filed. Clubjustin (talk) 11:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Clerk endorsed for sleeper check. I think all of this user's socks have already been blocked by Acroterion but let's make sure. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These are Tikeem cumberbatch (talk · contribs) (see SPI [1] ) socks, all instantly recognizable by their pre-adolescent scatological fixation. Probably no need for a sleeper check, though it would be nice if we could find a range to block. I've blocked at least a dozen of these waves of vandalism that come about twice a day. See recent entries in my blocking log for more [2] - you won't have much trouble guessing who is who. Acroterion (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Last time I looked, range blocks weren't feasible: too much collateral damage. Admittedly, I haven't looked lately. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that none of this user's socks are tagged. Do they need to be? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No per WP:DENY.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


12 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

I believe this is the same person, as recently some articles about some users getting covered in fecal matter keep showing up. I don't know if this is the same person, however. JumpiMaus (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. User just got blocked by Widr. JumpiMaus (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

12 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[3]. 'Nuff said. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


12 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[4] Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Already blocked. Please just take these accounts to AIV. Reporting them here is just giving them more attention and checkuser is not helpful in this case.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Duly noted. I was concerned that might be the case but wasn't clear on what to do in the alternative. Thanks much! Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets
 CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉) 22:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

14 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets
 CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉) 22:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

29 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Contribs (now deleted) and name. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk note: Closed by Bbb23. Archiving. QEDK (T ☕ C) 08:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 June 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Blocked and closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 June 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Self-admits on user page [5]. Meters (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Never mind. Blocked as I was adding this. Meters (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Self-admitted sock/vandalism only account. Blocked, tagged. Closing. Katietalk 20:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

...he admits it on his own user page. User:Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own was banned for sockpuppiteering. Has been vandalizing, as well. Amccann421 (talk) 02:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


03 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

He's admitted it here... That was easy. Amccann421 (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Creepy little attention seeker already blocked. Closing. Favonian (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Passes tuck test. User has repeatly created this article. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Added DogPoop600, who already claims to be this person here.--100.36.171.168 (talk) 23:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Added Dogshit6, who claims to be this person in an earlier edit of this investigation.--100.36.171.168 (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to just use WP:AIV for a faster response. Thanks, though. GABgab 00:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added User:Kevin Durant is a retard, who claims to be this person in an earlier version of this page and has already been blocked.--172.56.3.199 (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

10 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Created Tikeem J. Cumberbatch Memorial Bridge, supposedly in honor of this sockmaster. Account is a VOA anyway... CrowCaw 00:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • It's easy. Don't report the socks unless no one blocks them relatively quickly. WP:DENY. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Self-declared on userpage. Everymorning (talk) 04:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Just realized I submitted a duplicate of the SPI would an SPI clerk please delete it? Thanks! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This might be related to SGK Starship9000 SGK --Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

14 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Labeled own account as a doppelgänger account created by Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own an account that has been blocked for sock puppetry, The user page has since been deleted by Kelapstick would appreciate a check for sleepers. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me (Non-administrator comment) Linguist 111talk 04:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

16 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Vandalized Oklahoma City Thunder by changing the title name to "Chokeloma Shitty Blunder", a common trend of previous socks. Also human waste-related username. 172.56.3.98 (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • For the record, no sleepers found in a quick glance. Courcelles (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


More vandalism to Oklahoma City Thunder. 208.54.35.154 (talk) 23:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

29 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Admitted they were the sockmaster on their created articles - the deleted talk page and on User talk:MetaKnight93 [6] Linguist 111 talk 16:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


31 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Admitted to being sockpuppet on created article and associated talk page. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


01 August 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edits on User:King of Poop [7] and User:MetaKnight93 [8] indicate sockpuppetry. Linguist 111 talk 12:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

@Linguist111: Per WP:DENY, please do not file any more SPIs about this master unless the puppet has not yet been blocked. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


03 August 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Created Fort Tikeem station, a hoax article. 100.36.159.48 (talk) 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

13 August 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Admits to being sockmaster on the article ClueBot has Ebola. Please launch sleeper check. 172.56.2.141 (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

20 August 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Very similar name to what he has used in the past, such as User:Peepoopfarts, User:Poopypoopoooopoooooofart, and User:Poopyfartbutt ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

22 August 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Quack. Asking to be blocked as a self-admitted sock of Tikeem [9] Other edits also mention Tikeem, or modify various socks' tagging. Meters (talk) 03:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Meters (talk) 03:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. And blocked 4 minutes later by User:Zzuuzz . Meters (talk) 03:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Reverted, blocked and ignored. Closing. Favonian (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Admits on his userpage. Dedede92 (talk) 21:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

22 March 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Clerk filing: for the record since this one's been quiet for a while but definitely active today.

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • These are the most obvious of several that have already been blocked. As usual, do not tag. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22 June 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Created TIKEEM CUMBERBATCH ROCKS MY WORLD and a bunch of comparable crap. Summer vacation's here! Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I didn't mean to request CheckUser; I thought the box was unchecked but apparently fat-fingered something. Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked without a tag. Closing. GABgab 00:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Admitted it on theor own talkpage. CLCStudent (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • CU-confirmed and blocked. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Obvious; already blocked. Requesting CU for sleepers and range block if possible. Do not tag please. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Ajraddatz: The case had been confirmed, this account may need to be lock. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention as noted. Please also compare with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cow cleaner 5000, I don't know why these two cases haven't been connected before. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Confirmed as sock of Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own. No sleepers. But Cow cleaner 5000 accounts have unfortunately gone  Stale, CU won't yield anything useful here. - Mailer Diablo 17:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I should've checked that first. On behaviour, despite some obvious username overlap, they do appear to be users with very different agendas. One has a great wrong to right, the other just has a probably medically inadvisable obsession with feces (this is not medical advice, which I'm far from qualified to give). Closing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tikeem_cumberbatch_uttp_tcgp_own/Archive&oldid=1138680892"