Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srinesh.saravanan/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Srinesh.saravanan

Srinesh.saravanan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

18 August 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Procedural filing per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thiyagasothy. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Very DUCKy again, same sockfarm. Same sort of edits to same articles. Like [1][2] or [3][4] and other examples. Articles like Bigg Boss Tamil 2 is protected, so presumably they have to use an account again instead of dynamic IP hopping. As usual, ignoring talk page messages while making bad edits like changing colors, styling, removing templates, adding lots of unsourced material, etc. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

01 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Newly-created account with same edits to Riythvika [5] as previously-blocked [6] [7] and to Arav Nafeez [8] as [9] [10]. Plus a spattering of edits to Bigg Boss Tamil 2 and Bigg Boss Tamil 3, also edited heavily by master with same sort of minor mostly formatting summary-less edits one after another. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Both accounts are using the same device on the same open proxy, which is a different open proxy from the other accounts in the archive that I checked, but enough details are exact matches that I call them  Confirmed.  Blocked and tagged. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same username as User:Sarvesh.20010 or User:Sarvesh.2013. Same first edit like before. The only other edit is same sock edit as before. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 15:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same edits as confirmed socks: [11][12] or [13][14]. Editing in same set of articles. Previously blocked for 48h for block evasion. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 14:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • This looks like a stable IP, so I'm going to try a longer block this time. We should probably also semi-protect all the various articles that have been affected, although that's probably whack-a-mole. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15 December 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New user, straight to the same area articles. Name very close to previously-blocked User:Sherin.Love. Same type of edits: adding known_for ([15]), making empty edit request ([16]). —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

10 January 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Single-purpose accounts. Vrunda.amin recreated Draft:Losliya, which was previously created by User:Sherin.Love. (Losliya Mariyanesan was created by User:Srinesh.saravanan.) Lakshmi.venkatachalam created Draft:Losliya Marianesan. Also edited Kavin (actor) and Bigg Boss Tamil 3, which have many sock edits, although it could be a huge coincidence (although I doubt it given very similar account naming scheme). —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Oh wow, I didn't realize it's 2008 that the other account was created. That probably does predate the mass socking. That said, the sockmaster is likely not the original anyway, but just the account that started this particular chain of reports. I haven't followed this long enough to comment on when it started. The focus is Bigg Boss and related articles, and that's been around for more than a decade with the problematic edits from the start. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 19:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  •  In progress Mz7 (talk) 01:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vrunda.amin is  Confirmed.  Blocked and tagged. Lakshmi.venkatachalam is Red X Unrelated from a technical standpoint (on a different continent with a different device), but admittedly, their behavior is similar. The two Losliya drafts are similar, but there are several noticeable differences in their content: [17][18]. The Lakshmi.venkatachalam account also returned from a 12-year dormancy (created in 2008, far predating the sockmaster, but did not edit until a few months ago). I will defer it to another admin or clerk to decide whether that account should be blocked as well, notwithstanding the CU results. Mz7 (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked as likely UPE and SOCK, due to the common interest on the articles and drafts listed above. ST47 (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

PreethaHari recreated Draft:Losliya. Special:Contributions/175.38.87.157 edited immediately after, which is then likely their IP? In any case, the IP is likely the same master, since it's all edits are all to the Bigg Boss and related articles. Also saw Special:Contributions/175.38.70.118 doing same edits but not active recently. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Noticed when I wanted to G5 IP's draft, but it was made by an account. Created Draft:List of Bigg Boss (Tamil TV series) controversies. Next day Special:Contributions/175.38.87.157 somehow found this draft. Account naming also appears the same (two names with a period in between). Same topic area. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Active IP. Same Bigg Boss and person articles, same sort of edits, same language used. Same IP geolocation (Perth, Australia) as previously-blocked, for example Special:Contributions/175.38.87.157. See, for example Talk:Bigg Boss Tamil 1 edit request history for same language. Or this sort of sections previously reverted many times. I can probably find a bunch more edit similarity if really needed. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 March 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Active IP for 4 days. Continues to edit despite their edits being reverted, so reporting here. Same topic area (Bigg Boss articles). Same geolocation (Perth, Australia). Previously similar IPs blocked. I can prepare diffs with same types of edits (mostly changing tables, colors, person names/links) as evidence, although it looks like a blatant DUCK to me. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 April 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New account did the same edit as known IP range Special:Contributions/175.38.0.0/17. (I did not report IP before, rather mentioned to sysop previously blocking them (here, but I'm listing it here now). Same naming scheme as previous confirmed accounts. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

14 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New account straight to editing the same topic area. Username is an actor name Karanvir Bohra like some of other previous accounts. Making the same edits as the IP: [19][20] or [21][22] or [23][24][25]. The new IP is from the same geolocation (Perth, Australia) as previously confirmed socks/IPs. Looks like they might be on a static IP now, since the usual range is still blocked. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

For IP: same IP range. Same edits with same summary to same topic area interspersed with new and confirmed accounts. New accounts: same edits at the same time with same style of summaries and even names are similar to each other and previous blocked ones. It's blatant DUCK to me, though I can provide diffs if needed. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 14:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


28 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New account recreated Draft:Losliya. Immediately edited by IP from same geolocation as before. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They have since edited Bigg Boss and actor related articles since as before. Now also created Draft:Somerly Primary School. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 20:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 June 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New user recreated Draft:Losliya with a single edit. So far, socks have been doing this. Latest SPI 28 May. If not sock, then most likely UPE again. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

20 August 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The account created Losliya, which has been a constant socking target, although the content is different, so it might be a huge coincidence. Although they ignored AfC result, which usually indicates issues. Their decent use of wiki syntax and such might indicate prior knowledge. Name is "LosliyaFC", which is likely "Fan Club"? Having persons and Losliya's name in name has been common. Word "fan" was used by "Oviya.fan", although that might be a stretch. They linked the person's article [26], which socks have done aplenty, but it's also an expected edit for linking to a new article. Then there's Special:Contributions/49.196.29.132 (Perth, Australia) who ended up on the same Losliya article intermixing edits which is the geolocation of sock IPs (175.38.65.109/16, 58.108.12.151/16). But again, could be a big coincidence and the IP stumbling upon the article. Notifying the user in this case. Asking for CU because I'm only like 50% sure it's a sock account and a quick IP check could instantly confirm. I'm 99% sure about 49.196.29.132. I'm listing it for completeness since I've given up reporting every IP they hop through. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 15:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New account editing and restoring same edits on an article that known sock IP is edit warring at (and I'm reverting per WP:BANREVERT). Same name as confirmed User:Nehashitole90. IP geolocation matches all the previous socking. I would also request an IP (range) block, since they have not let up despite previous blocks and their edits span the whole of regional Big Boss and related articles. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 January 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New account straight to persistent editing of Bigg Boss (primarily, Bigg Boss Tamil) and related actor articles. Most telling is Somshekar -- creating a full articles, then immediately edited by the IP already-associated with this sockfarm. Re-creating Santhosh Kumar (Sandy Master) article, which has been a target of socks forever. Asking CU since there might be new accounts and IPs/ranges since last time. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 20:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 August 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Similar username pattern and article interests. Recreating articles deleted in deletion discussions and that involved prior socks. Specifically Losliya involved several socks in this case, and Pavithra Lakshmi involved socks from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giriprasad Damodar 02 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romil.Choudary. Clearly not a new user, see edits 5 and 6: [27][28] with good formatting and creation of well formatted article on edit 11 (immediately after reaching auto-confirmed). Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 August 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Shruthi Hari is a newly created SPA, that shows up to remove a PROD on article created by now blocked sock. Implausible level of Wikipedia markup knowledge, e.g. [29].

Also 58.108.95.170 is clearly them too based on article overlap and on this close editing sequence with blocked sock Kavitha.Syed:

  1. 13:25: IP [30]
  2. 13:26: Page move by KS sock
  3. 13:27: IP [31]

Note this is the only action done by Kavitha.Syed on 23 August. Page moves may only be performed by auto-confirmed users and neither the IP nor newly created SPA were AC. The user must have realized they needed an AC account and logged in to do that and that only.

Also 175.38.56.218 is clearly them. Same ISP, same geolocations, and picking up editing where 58.108.95.170 left off, beginning on the evening of 24 August and continuing on the 25th. Overlap in articles is too large to be coincidental.

Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 September 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


83-edit account, created Survivor (Tamil season 1) previously created by sock Kavitha.Syed, a week after it was G5ed. Shares topic interests with master here. Also checkuser blocked on Commons (appears to be confirmed to Kavitha.Syed there by User:Elcobbola's blocking log on Commons). Checkuser to confirm + flush out additional accounts (e.g. the report above, and there are possibly other low edit accounts involved), there are more edits on enwiki than on Commons, so CU on enwiki is more likely to glean results. Remyas.45 is checkuser blocked on Commons (same batch), and overlaps on article interests in enwiki (Tamil Survivor). On Commons Sanjay.Thumma and Anjana.Rangan.Fan are also CU blocked from the batch, but both do not have enwiki edits. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 14:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also there is Category:Sockpuppets of Srinesh.saravanan on Commons with better confirmation than the blocker's log for the connection of Poorika and Remyas.45 to this case. Perusing the socks on Commons, it may be worthwhile to merge Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romil.Choudary into this case as Romil.Choudary, Powerstar2020, Nirojaradha, and Bilal.Choudary2 are marked there as Srinesh.saravanan socks and on the Romil.Choudary archive on enwiki the connection has also been raised by User:Finngall and User:Hellknowz.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 15:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]



01 October 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Newly created Progressiveness account re-reverted an edit of Poorika that was reverted. I was mildly suspicious yesterday and had a look at their edits, and I [ reverted them at Quinns Rocks, Western Australia. The next day 175.38.56.218 shows up, and reverts.

Both 175.38.56.218 and Progressiveness share an interest with previous socks here (e.g. Poorika). The IP edited Survivor (the Tamil version) and associated BLPs, and locations in Australia. Progressiveness also edited various Indian entertainment figures in addition to Australia edits (and re-instating Poorika's edit).

Furthermore, the archive here is full of IPs from 175.38.0.0/17 range and the range had been blocked twice (1 month each) in 2020 for socking in this case. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

10 January 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 May 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]