Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheriffIsInTown/Archive
SheriffIsInTown
- SheriffIsInTown (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
15 May 2016[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Homemade Pencils (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This account all edits are "minor edits mostly general and typo fixes and (s)he never edited any article related to India Pakistan Bangladesh. However, this user (Homemade Pencils) suddenly made a comment at Talk:1971 Bangladesh genocide in support of SheriffIsInTown and his POV version (before him, allmost all, uninvolved user's rejected SheriffIsInTown's POV version).
He suddenly voted in the RFC of the page (he never edited before). In fact, as I said, Homemade Pencils has never made any edit to India Pakistan Bangladesh project area.
Take a look at SheriffIsInTown comments like ...You are trying to WP:CENSOR Wikipedia, We would not provide any service to encyclopedia if we WP:CENSOR them because.... After other uninvolved users like Kautilya3, My very best wishes, Vinegarymass911, etc rejected SheriffIsInTown's POV version, this seemingly newbie account suddenly comments at RFC *Accept - Yes, the sources being added are clearly reliable and there is no reason to censure the information in them. This article will not succeed at achieving neutrality unless it includes details from all the perspectives advocated in scholarly sources. Sheriff said everything that needed to be said, definitely include this.
Check user should run a check. This can also expose some sleeper accounts.ArghyaIndian (talk) 10:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
- Closing with no action for lack of evidence. Filer is also in an ongoing dispute with the alleged master. This is not the only forum in which they have sought sanctions against SheriffsInTown (see WP:AE).--Bbb23 (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)