Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shashanksinghvi334/Archive
Shashanksinghvi334
- Shashanksinghvi334 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
19 February 2020
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Ambrosiawater (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
A possible case of !vote-fraud and looks like an undisclosed paid sockfarm who participate in AfDs only for financial benefits. In Jan 2020, after inactivity of ten months, master participated in four AfDs and was supported by the suspected sock in the first three in the same row within 13 hours, and they have participated in five AfDs together since the master account was reactivated per this EIA report. Requesting CU for technical connection and sleepers.
P.S. If any of them located in Rajasthan, India then I'll say they have a connection with Meeanaya (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) sockfarm based on some off-wiki evidence. GSS 💬 13:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't want to spill the beans so please feel free to ask me for the email. Since Meeanaya was blocked by Yunshui, she started sub-contracting freelancers on various platforms such as Freelancer, Upwork etc. and also edit from IP addresses to evade the block. In October 2019, she participated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recovery Centers of America where she was joined Ambrosiawater and both !voted keep. Please note it was the first time for Ambrosiawater to participate an AfD, before voting in RCoA he randomly picked a few for eye washing (voting in six AfDs within eight minutes?). GSS 💬 17:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- The two users are
Unrelated (different continents). Shashanksinghvi334 is a technical match to Meeanaya. 
Behavioural evidence needs evaluation.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC) - Indeffed Shashanksinghvi334 & reblocked Meeanaya. Tagged both. The behavioral evidence shows a bunch of probable UPE editors tendering for Wiki work, and competing against each other. UPEs yes, socks no. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 12:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
28 September 2020
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Mineraltimer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Defjroeg (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
They sound like related to this sockmaster and only here to promote House of Roper-Curzon. Mineraltimer created House of Curzon, House of Roper, Harry Roper-Curzon and Henry Roper-Curzon, 18th Baron Teynham and Defjoeg created Henry Christopher John Ingham Roper-Curzon. GSS 💬 17:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- The connection to the past socks is tenuous at best; Shashanksinghvi showed up at a Roper-Curzon AfD and ran ReFill on the article, but that's not strong behavioral evidence. More likely that it's a different set of UPEs, but I don't have enough evidence to block on those grounds. Closed without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)