Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PunjabCinema07/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


PunjabCinema07

PunjabCinema07 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

03 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Yet another Chahal cronie trying to whitewash Gurbaksh Chahal with nearly identical requests as past socks Praxidicae (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 There's a long history of the subject having people whitewash his article via IP and accounts, some of the more recent ones are the master here, an ip, another IP, AruneekBiswas, MrRight2020, etc... this is certainly another meat puppet if not the same master(s) directly. Praxidicae (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

@Praxidicae: What past socks?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed to AruneekBiswas (talk · contribs · count). Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

After I left a comment on Talk:Gurbaksh Chahal an article and talk page had been affected by disclosed and undisclosed paid editing (per the earlier SPI and the article talk page), HennaSky makes their first edits to comment on the issue on my talk page [1]. Two hours later they made 10 minor edits over Wikipedia which were supposed to be improvements but frankly often weren't (I reverted 3, at least 2 others were reverted by someone else) e.g. [2] where the source didn't say 'at least'. Meanwhile the 84 IP had added a date & tried to ping me to HennaSky's comment [3]. A few hours before, the 84 IP had edited Rubina Bajwa including to add a Chahal connection [4]. Both PunjabCinema07 and User:Meeanaya seem to also be interested in both these people including their connection [5]. The 84 IP infact edited the Bajwa article not long after its creation by PunjabCinema07 [6] back in November [7]. I noticed the 85 IP had edited the day before [8]. While it hasn't edited since November the fact these are consecutive IPs makes me think this isn't a simple changing dynamic IP. I appreciate no public connection can be made by CUs between the IP and any accounts, but I'm hoping there's enough for a duck. Nil Einne (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
The IPs are obviously both the same user too, based on .84 copyediting HennaSky's comments, and significant SPA topic overlap. Range blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same focus on Rubina Bajwa, with this edit being almost exactly the same as this series from a previously blocked IP.

May need to consider semi-protection on the Bajwa article given the apparent focus on editing it. Ravensfire (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]