Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince-au-Léogâne/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Prince-au-Léogâne

Prince-au-Léogâne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
14 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Prince-au-Léogâne created articles under the titles Joél "J-Pimp" Filsaime, Joél Célestin Filsaime, and Prince-au-Léogâne (FLAG). These articles were deleted, but in them AKAs for this person were Prince-au-Léogâne and ThaPimpOfThaSouth. The newer ThaPimpOfThaSouth was trying to create articles about D-Ploy Records, the alleged record label of ThaPimpOfThaSouth and Prince-au-Léogâne. It would appear that ThaPimpOfThaSouth was being used to circumvent the current 72 hour block imposed upon Prince-au-Léogâne. EricSerge (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
02 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Alleged sockpuppeteer wrote articles about a certain rapper, and was eventually blocked. JFilsaime then created same articles about said rapper, with lots of nonesense about being a self-proclaimed royal prince. IP began removing speedy tag. IP also only began editing same articles of alleged sockpuppeteer. Singularity42 (talk) 02:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Oh, FloridaFinest was my first block...I may need a moment. *snif* Drmies (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Prince-au-Léogâne created articles under the titles Joél "J-Pimp" Filsaime, Joél Célestin Filsaime, and Prince-au-Léogâne (FLAG). These articles were deleted, but in them AKAs for this person were Prince-au-Léogâne and ThaPimpOfThaSouth. The newer ThaPimpOfThaSouth was trying to create articles about D-Ploy Records, the alleged record label of ThaPimpOfThaSouth and Prince-au-Léogâne. It would appear that ThaPimpOfThaSouth was being used to circumvent the current 72 hour block imposed upon Prince-au-Léogâne. EricSerge (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
04 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The article J Pimp about a non-notable rapper (no information about any gold album at the RIAA database) which was created by Jason Prince has exactly the same content as the one that was deleted after Prince-au-Léogâne wrote it. Looks a lot like block evasion. De728631 (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
10 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

  1. String of sock accounts exposed in short period of time, likely building a sockfarm.
  2. Socking occurs around narrow topic, repeated vandalism and disruption through re-creation of page over and over again, with different name variants.
  3. Checkuser technical investigation requested, in order to: (1) Find other sleeper sock accounts, and (2) Apply a rangeblock for the underlying IPs.

Thank you for your time. -- Cirt (talk) 02:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I have little to add, except that I thank Cirt for their efforts in cleaning this Augean stable. No doubt more will come along. Can we filter out J-Pimp and Leogane, or have it set off some sort of alarm bell? Drmies (talk) 02:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a related ANI discussion at WP:ANI#"Prince Joel". Thanks, Cirt!. Singularity42 (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Cirt! Ian Cairns (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Clerk endorsed for the following: 1) Confirmation of all accounts (as some are blocked on very little) 2) A sleeper check 3) An IP hardblock. -- DQ (t) (e) 03:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All  Confirmed – I think you got 'em all. –MuZemike 05:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
19 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

More activity from this blocked user, reposting the same material again. Submitting for checkuser in case they may have created other sleeper accounts and/or recreated other deleted material at the same time as the recent article creation. -- The Anome (talk) 11:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Clerk note: I have filed this case per the misfiled request on the archive page, and have asked the filing editor to post comments here as to the reasons. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 11:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Clerk note: BlaqBery recreated an article that was more or less identical to others created by the master. The article has since been deleted. Either way, both the IP and the sock are blocked, so not much else to do here. but I'm endorsing for a checkuser to find sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 11:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Didn't see any sleepers. TNXMan 13:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Was worth a look anyways. Closing Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 13:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
27 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Recreating category originally created by sockmaster. Of the two articles added, one was created by another sock. Many of these socks have usernames that are Florida-related. There's a history of nests with this one, so a Checkuser would be useful. Singularity42 (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed as being the same as FloridaExecutives (talk · contribs). No other sleepers. TNXMan 17:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't feel like tagging him today. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
30 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Pretty obvious based on edit history that this is the sockmaster logged off. I was willing to let it slide (as the edits were mostly harmless - just formatting the article created by the socks which will soon be deleted, adding articles to the category made by the sock that isn't controversial, etc.). But is now editing one of the block socks' userpage to indicate it is an administrator. That's pretty disruptive behaviour for a blocked sockmaster to do while logged off. Singularity42 (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

No check performed, but I blocked the IP for fairly obvious block evasion. TNXMan 18:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13 July 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

He's back. And creating the same articles as before. WP:DUCK. History of nests and multiple IP addresses, so I'm requesting a CheckUser just to see if there are any other socks over the last few days. Singularity42 (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You might also want to check User:WikiHutUSA -- They were "welcomed" by User:76.109.142.168 above; and I've deleted a page full of banners on their userpage that seemed to be identical to one created by a similar-seeming account a week or two earlier. -- The Anome (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Both named users are  Confirmed matches. No comment on the IP. TNXMan 13:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

15 July 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


this new user asked at Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard#Need help creating article: (J-Pimp) why he wasn't able to create an article at this salted title. This may be an innocent newcomer, but in view of the extensive history of sockpuppetry around this subject, I request a CU check. JohnCD (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed TNXMan 18:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Blocked and tagged. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
15 October 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK. Creating the same article the other socks always create - this time created at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J-Pimp (rapper) Singularity42 (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

No comment on the IPs, but the following are the same:

20 October 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Still at it. The sockmaster's main IP is being used to dispute the deletion of the articles created by the sockmaster), vandalize the AfD page for the articles created by the sockmaster, and vandalize the sockpuppet category. This is all typical behaviour of the socks in this case. Requesting a lengthier block of the IP. Singularity42 (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Singularity42 (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

The IP has not edited since yesterday. While I'd certainly be happy to block them if they continue to edit, they may also disappear for a few months again. Please relist if they become active again. TNXMan 13:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

03 February 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Mostly for recordkeeping purposes, they replaced the Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prince-au-Léogâne page with a file deletion tag here. The category page was already vandalized before. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • It's possible, based upon past IP geolocations and contributions. As the IP hasn't made an edit for 4-5 days, I don't think a block is needed right now. The user seems to hop to different IPs, so blocking it might unintentionally affect someone else. Mike V • Talk 00:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 February 2018[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Duck: only edits so far are creation of Joél Filsaime (rapper) The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action -  Looks like a duck to me. Please block, delete and salt the created article. Sro23 (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Administrator note DGGD2018 blocked and tagged, article deleted and salted. Ben MacDui 12:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

27 September 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

evidence is primarily on simple.wikipedia with edits to since-deleted J-Pimp articles, and now the additions here on enlish.wikipedia regarding (Joel) Celestin Filsaime who is a trillionaire due to bitcoin investments.

The user name should be blocked. And the IP addresses range blocked. Quakewoody (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

The master and all the socks in the archive are  Stale. However, HipHopSocialGroup is confirmed to MyNewToy2019 (talk · contribs · count). Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Prince-au-Léogâne/Archive&oldid=1079617537"