Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnjacksonhtx/Archive

Johnjacksonhtx

Johnjacksonhtx (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

29 September 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Websamaria (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Mleee7156 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Per WP:DUCK given the activity at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Finnih. This is at best case scenario an instance of WP:MEAT-voting to try to keep the promotional article created by Johnjacksonhtx. GPL93 (talk) 13:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I have made several edits on three subjects (Trae Tha Truth, Z-ro, and Emmanuel Finnih) with verifiable references . The edits/articles are plausible, verifiable, and legit, and This is my only account. Able to follow up upon request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnjacksonhtx (talk • contribs) 22:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: It looks like they admit to making edits on the two accounts in this comment. GPL93 (talk) 19:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I think they are just incorrectly using the word "account" when they really mean "article". The two other articles they edited are Z-Ro and Trae tha Truth. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

CheckUser requested - Given that the two suspected socks have made only one edit each, I'm requesting a CU to confirm. Bbb23 (talk) 23:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On hold - For training -- RoySmith (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Somewhat ducky but not clear enough on behavioral grounds alone. If these do not turn out confirmed, we can close this with a canvassing warning. MarioGom (talk) 16:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In progress - Girth Summit _(blether) 18:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, these accounts are certainly Possible, in the sense that they are geolocate to the same city, and they are using the same two (very common) user agents. They don't show up on the same IP ranges though, so I can't go stronger than that. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation I will note that Johnjacksonhtx does indeed have another account; since they have not edited with it however, I will not mention its name unless behavioural investigation indicates that a block is necessary. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a talk page warning to Johnjacksonhtx. Please, report again if canvassing or meatpuppetry continues. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]