Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JibinGs/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


JibinGs

JibinGs (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

09 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obvious SPAs (either socks or meat) on Adventure Emirates, which the alleged master created. The registered account popped up to add material and remove a tag, and the IP geolocates to... wait for it... Ajman in the UAE. GABgab 21:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Bonvallite is Red X Unrelated. I know of no other master, among all the Degioia masters I'm aware of to whom Bonvallite is related.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to report this as well. IP 180.215.123.156 twice removed Guanaco's CSD noms, and now suddenly an SPA pops up to do the same. I strongly suspect that the IPs are Waffen, particularly because of their poor attempts at contesting the G5 speedy delete nom. "the article was created before the ban it must not be speed deleted as it will be violation of CSD 5 if its deleted" No, obviously Waffen was indeffed long before the article was created. However, I'm curious what should ultimately be done about Jibin George Sebastian. Could it in fact be speedied under G5? Apart from normal article tagging and cat additions and other maintenance issues, the only substantive content was added by an IP in the 180.215.* range. If we believe this is the same person, can we delete? Do we consider the tagging and cleanup edits to be "substantial"? (Cue new SPAs fleshing out the article to skirt speedy-delete rules, I say cynically.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]