Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hasdie hasnan/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hasdie hasnan

Hasdie hasnan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

05 September 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


This diff. Accounts have very similar username, and Hasdiehasnan22 made edits to Hasdie hasnan userpage. The accounts don't seem to have done anything disruptive. However, I'm reporting this here in case more is discovered, or if there is more to this that I did not see. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 17:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • He's here to promote himself (see here).--Bbb23 (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Admin action needed - His first account is Hasdie (talk · contribs) which has no edits (created on 11 June 2013). His behavior is disruptive because he created autobiographic articles (see: [1] and [2]). Please, indef Hasdiehasnan22 and warn Hasdie hasnan. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done per request. Mkdwtalk 19:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13 July 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Continued attempts at self-promotion. Hasdiehasnan2212 was the creator of the version of Hasdie Hasnan which was deleted at AfD. Vevoartistasean recreated the article in the form of userspace drafts. Vevoasean1 created Draft:Hasdie Hasnan, repeatedly resubmitted it to the point of tendentiousness (draft was eventually deleted at MfD), and more recently tried to repost the content to the AfD page. Datohussin popped up today to resume pleading his case. --Finngall talk 14:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Bearcat originally protected the page. Following spotting attempts to reinsert article material on old AfD pages, I've been engaging with the latest sock, not realising he is a sock. His replies were sufficiently shifty that I disengaged and left a message in the protection log for any future admin who might consider unprotecting, although I didn't mention any socking as unaware until now. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to add that the version that was posted by Vevoasean1 to overwrite the AFD discussion was written in the first person I/me — and Datohussin's attempt, just one week later, is based on the strategy of trying to get the mainspace title unprotected without actually showing the content they want to post by creating a sandbox or draft version first. Bearcat (talk) 15:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wasn't aware of Draft:Hasdie Hasnan. Noting that Primefac has protected that, too. AfC anyone? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I know it becomes difficult to create a draft when the draft has been protected, but I've been dealing with Hasnan's terrible articles and drafts for entirely too long. After it got nixed at MFD and then recreated salting seemed like a good idea. If someone can show me a half-decent sandbox draft that isn't full of suck I'm happy to unsalt the draft title and move it there. Primefac (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, trust me, I hear you. Datohussin has since posted the entirety of their proposed draft to their own talk page — and quite unsurprisingly, it shows no stronger claim of notability and no better sourcing than any of the prior attempts have. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk To determine whether this is more likely meat or sockpuppetry. The first two accounts are stale. Please compare Vevoasean1 with Datohussin. Sro23 (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a slam dunk. H2P studios is linked to this guy, as per this. The writing style of that account is very reminiscent of this. Moreover, here, the other guy essentially admits to being the master by writing an article in first person. All blocked and tagged, closing. GABgab 22:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]