Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chander/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Chander

Chander (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

07 November 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Contributions closely resemble (mostly to one of the sock User:Digvijay411, and was created at about the same time), they are editing the same articles that the master had interest on. And as usual, they were in dispute (as the history of Karan Singh Grover tells) with Durr-e-shahwar's sock. Looking at the date of creation, there might be a probability of sleepers. —UY Scuti Talk 06:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • @Vanjagenije: Per this, User:Digvijay411 is the sock of User:Rishika.dhanawade. The suspected sock has had high interests in the topics edited by the sock master. In this 50 revisions, Digvijay and Jimmy Aneja reverted the same revisions here and here, while letting away Rishika's revision here. I suspect they might've been using these accounts to show that consensus is on their side. —UY Scuti Talk 10:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 😄 I so knew something was fishy about this.—UY Scuti Talk 17:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Additional information needed - @UY Scuti: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • All the accounts have been blocked and tagged. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14 December 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Same editorial pattern and most interested subject Karanvir Bohra. Whereas, Tags were removed of maintenance plus this article was written by IP addresses with tag removal process despite protection. D'SuperHero (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Chander's past history of edits are mostly targetted to Indian soap opera actors. Seemingly, This sock has done numerous edits to Karanvir Bohra, see [1], [2], [3] and in which he added a Redlinked template. Whereas edits of Chander matched same patterns, have a look, [4], [5], [6], [7] and [8]. Chander constantly edit warred and restored his own views. Despite only writing "Unexplained Revert". Pattern of Rishab has a resembling edit pattern by Sockmaster. D'SuperHero (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Additional information needed - @D'SuperHero: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk endorsed - Please, compare Rishab Sarpotdar to the master. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technically, Rishab Sarpotdar appears  Unlikely to Chander. Mike V • Talk 20:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Behavioral evidence is not strong enough to block, so I'm closing this with no action. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chander/Archive&oldid=1086090798"